Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Hernandez-Barraza v. Wrigley
as 24-1886
Petitioner:
JOSE ISRAEL HERNANDEZ-BARRAZA
Respondent:
JEFF WRIGLEY
Hernandez-Barraza v. Thornell
as 2:2023cv02087
Petitioner:
Jose Israel Hernandez-Barraza
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barraza v. Shinn et al
as 2:2023cv00149
Petitioner:
Jose Israel Hernandez Barraza
Respondent:
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Israel Hernandez v. City of Los Angeles
as 2:2019cv00441
Plaintiff:
Jully Romero and Israel Hernandez
Defendant:
Officer Andres Martinez, City of Los Angeles, DOES 1 through 100, inclusive and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Israel Hernandez v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 2:2018cv01546
Defendant:
Galpin Motors, Inc., Ford Motor Company, Galpin Motors, Inc. a California corporation doing business as Galpin Ford and others
Plaintiff:
Israel Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
USA v. Israel Hernandez
as 17-50178
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ISRAEL HERNANDEZ
Israel Hernandez Alvarado v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-71128
Petitioner:
ISRAEL HERNANDEZ ALVARADO
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Hernandez-Barraza v. Ryan et al
as 2:2017cv00158
Petitioner:
Jose Israel Hernandez-Barraza
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Isreal Hernandez-Rodriguez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-72395
Petitioner:
ISREAL HERNANDEZ-RODRIGUEZ, AKA Israel Hernandez-Rodriguez
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Isreal Hernandez-Rodriguez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-70899
Petitioner:
ISREAL HERNANDEZ-RODRIGUEZ, AKA Israel Hernandez-Rodriguez
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
