Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Barnes v. Nelnet Business Solutions et al
as 2:2026cv00275
Plaintiff:
Richard S Barnes
Defendant:
Nelnet Business Solutions, Nelnet Diversified Solutions, Nelnet Government Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Dale Williamson v. State of Indiana, et al
as 25-3236
Plaintiff:
DALE WILLIAMSON
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, DREW WILSON, Ivy Tech Community College Indiana Board Of Trustee Chair, professional compactly, SUE ELLSPERMANN, Ivy Tech Community College Indiana Presidet, professional compactly and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv02103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2
LANHAM v. ELLSPERMANN et al
as 1:2025cv01709
Plaintiff:
DAVID LANHAM
Defendant:
SUE ELLSPERMANN and IVY TECH COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF BLOOMINGTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv01448
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv01127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv00428
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Brown v. Ivy Tech Community College
as 3:2025cv00427
Plaintiff:
Heidi Davonne Brown
Defendant:
Ivy Tech Community College
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv00850
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Heidi Brown v. Ivy Tech Community College
as 25-1167
Plaintiff:
HEIDI DAVONNE BROWN
Defendant:
IVY TECH COMMUNITY COLLEGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
