Cases
Deng et al v. BNP Paribas, S.A. et al
as 1:2023cv07468
Plaintiff: Deng Yel Akol Deng, Yussif Mohammed Sabil, Salah Bahket Bahket and others
Defendant: BNP Paribas, S.A., BNP Paribas, S.A., New York Branch and BNP Paribas US Wholesale Holdings, Corp.
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: Charity Lowoh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pi Diversity-Personal Injury
Sherf et al v. BNP Paribas, S.A. et al
as 1:2023cv04986
Plaintiff: Haleima Nasralden Sherf, Yahya Arbab Khamis, Anwar Hamed Elnour and others
Defendant: BNP Paribas, S.A., BNP Paribas S.A. New York Branch and BNP Paribas US Wholesale Holdings, Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Bonner v. City of New York et al
as 1:2019cv07162
Defendant: John and Jane Doe 1-10, Ibrahim Adam and City of New York
Plaintiff: Marcus Bonner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adam v. State of Washington We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv01183
Petitioner: Ibrahim Adam
Respondent: State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Adam v. State of Washington We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv01136
Petitioner: Ibrahim Adam
Respondent: State of Washington and Jeffrey Uttecht
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Adam v. Superior Court of the State of Washington We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv00169
Petitioner: Ibrahim Adam
Respondent: Superior Court of the State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Adam v. Holder We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-9577
Petitioner: OMAR MOHAMED ADAM, a/k/a Ibrahim Adam Muhumed
Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., United States Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv05842
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?