Cases 31 - 40 of 101
Nautilus, Inc. v. Icon Health & Fitness, Inc.
as 3:2016cv05393
Plaintiff:
Nautilus, Inc.
Defendant:
Icon Health & Fitness, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Sportbrain Holdings LLC v. Icon Health & Fitness, Inc.
as 1:2016cv02551
Plaintiff:
Sportbrain Holdings LLC
Defendant:
Icon Health & Fitness, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Icon Health & Fitness, Inc. v. iHealth Lab Inc.
as 5:2016cv00231
Plaintiff:
Icon Health & Fitness, Inc.
Defendant:
iHealth Lab Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Icon Health & Fitness, Inc. v. Proform Pt, LLC
as 6:2015cv01887
Plaintiff:
Icon Health & Fitness, Inc.
Defendant:
ProForm PT, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
ICON Health & Fitness Incorporated v. Korhun
as 2:2015cv01981
Defendant:
Oleksandr Korhun
Plaintiff:
ICON Health & Fitness Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Icon Health & Fitness v. Polar Electro Oy, et al
as 15-4104
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ICON HEALTH & FITNESS, INC., a Delaware corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
POLAR ELECTRO OY, a Finnish company and POLAR ELECTRO INC., a Delaware corporation
W.A.Y.S.S. Inc. v. ICON Health & Fitness, Inc.
as 1:2015cv05023
Plaintiff:
W.A.Y.S.S. Inc.
Defendant:
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Toesox, Inc. v. Icon Health & Fitness Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00873
Plaintiff:
Toesox, Inc.
Defendant:
Icon Health & Fitness Inc. and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Icon Health & Fitness v. Zhongshan Camry Electronic et al
as 1:2014cv00002
Plaintiff:
Icon Health & Fitness
Defendant:
Zhongshan Camry Electronic and Atlantic Promotions
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Hyper Wear, Inc. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc et al
as 1:2014cv00011
Defendant:
Gold's Gym Merchandising LLC, ICON Health & Fitness, Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Hyper Wear, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
