Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv10651
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv14248
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv14246
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Garcia-Ayala v. Federal Express Corporation
as 2:2026cv10459
Plaintiff:
Ignacio Garcia-Ayala
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv07430
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Molina v. Omaha Steaks International, LLC
as 1:2026cv26329
Plaintiff:
Ignacio Molina
Defendant:
Omaha Steaks International, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
MOLINA v. FCA US LLC
as 1:2026cv26331
Plaintiff:
IGNACIO MOLINA
Defendant:
FCA US LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv10390
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv01619
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MOLINA v. COOKUNITY INC.
as 1:2026cv26328
Plaintiff:
IGNACIO MOLINA
Defendant:
COOKUNITY INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
