Cases 1 - 10 of 26
State of Oregon v. Donald Trump
as 26-1804
Plaintiff:
STATE OF WASHINGTON, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF OREGON and others
Defendant:
DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, MARKWAYNE MULLIN, Secretary of Homeland Security and others
Amicus Curiae:
ADVANCING AMERICAN FREEDOM, INC., JONATHAN BEAN, PETER T. CALCAGNO and others
Learning Resources, Inc., et al v. Donald Trump, et al
as 25-5202
Plaintiff:
Learning Resources, Inc. and hand2mind, Inc.
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, in his official capacity, Kristi Noem, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, in her official capacity, United States Department of Homeland Security and others
Amicus Curiae:
America First Legal Foundation, Washington Legal Foundation, Coalition for a Prosperous America and others
V.O.S. Selections, Inc. v. Trump
as 25-1812
Plaintiff:
V.O.S. SELECTIONS, INC., PLASTIC SERVICES AND PRODUCTS, LLC, dba Genova Pipe, MICROKITS, LLC and others
Defendant:
DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States, EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT, UNITED STATES and others
Amicus Curiae:
CRUTCHFIELD CORPORATION, AMERICA FIRST LEGAL FOUNDATION, COALITION FOR A PROSPEROUS AMERICA and others
American Society of Journalist, et al v. Xavier Becerra
as 20-55408
Defendant / Appellee:
XAVIER BECERRA, Attorney General of the State of California
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATIONAL PRESS PHOTOGRAPHERS ASSOCIATION and AMERICAN SOCIETY OF JOURNALISTS AND AUTHORS, INC.
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN SOCIETY OF MEDIA PHOTOGRAPHERS, INC., INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS FOUNDATION, REASON FOUNDATION and others
Worman, et al v. Healey, et al
as 18-1545
Defendant:
MASSACHUSETTS STATE POLICE and CHARLES D. BAKER, in his official capacity as Governor of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Amicus Curiae:
ROYCE BARONDES, GREATER BOSTON INTERFAITH ORGANIZATION, MASSACHUSETTS CHIEFS OF POLICE ASSOCIATION, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID SETH WORMAN, ANTHONY LINDEN, JASON WILLIAM SAWYER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD D. MCKEON, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Massachusetts State Police, MAURA T. HEALEY, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, KERRY GILPIN, in her official capacity as Superintendent of the Massachusetts State Police and others
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS ANDREW FELD
Virginia Duncan, et al v. Xavier Becerra
as 17-56081
Amicus Curiae:
CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS, GAYS AGAINST GUNS, PRIDE FUND TO END GUN VIOLENCE and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER WADDELL, VIRGINIA DUNCAN, DAVID MARGUGLIO and others
Defendant / Appellant:
XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California
Competitive Enterprise Institu, et al v. EPA, et al
as 15-1488
Petitioner:
Competitive Enterprise Institute, Buckeye Institute for Public Policy Solutions, Independence Institute and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Regina A. McCarthy, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Amicus Curiae For Petitioner:
Municipal Electric Authority of Georgia
Movant-Amicus Curiae For Respondent:
American Thoracic Society, American Medical Association, American College of Preventive Medicine and others
Independence Institute v. Gessler
as 14-1463
Plaintiff - Appellant:
INDEPENDENCE INSTITUTE
Defendant - Appellee:
SCOTT GESSLER, in his official capacity as the Colorado Secretary of State
Independence Institute v. FEC
as 14-5249
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Independence Institute, A Colorado nonprofit corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
Federal Election Commission
INDEPENDENCE INSTITUTE v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
as 1:2014cv01500
Plaintiff:
INDEPENDENCE INSTITUTE
Defendant:
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
Amicu:
CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER , DEMOCRACY 21 and PUBLIC CITIZEN, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.