Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Trustees of the Indiana State Council of Roofers Health and Welfare Fund v. Camaco Inc.
as 4:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Indiana State Council of Roofers Health and Welfare Fund
Defendant:
CAMACO INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
D7 Roofing, LLC et al v. United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers and Allied Workers et al
as 4:2023cv00091
Plaintiff:
D7 Roofing, LLC and Kehrer Brothers West Roofing, Inc.
Defendant:
United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers, and Allied Workers, Roofers and Waterproofers Research and Education Joint Trust Fund and Roofers Local #2 Supplemental Pension Plan
Counter Claimant:
National Roofing Industry Pension Plan and Indiana State Council of Roofers Health and Welfare Fund
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Trustees of the Indiana State Council of Roofers Health and Welfare Fund v. Capital Painting and Coatings LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00048
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Indiana State Council of Roofers Health and Welfare Fund
Defendant:
CAPITAL PAINTING AND COATINGS LLC and Kelsey Cook
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Trustees of the Indiana State Council of Roofers Health and Welfare Fund et al v. Downing Roofing, Inc
as 4:2021cv00069
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Indiana State Council of Roofers Health and Welfare Fund, Trustees of the United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers and Allied Workers, Local Union No. 2 Supplemental Pension Fund, Trustees of the National Roofing Industry Pension Plan and others
Defendant:
DOWNING ROOFING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Trustees of the Indiana State Council of Roofers Health and Welfare Fund et al v. Sancar Services, Inc.
as 4:2021cv00038
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers and Allied Workers, Local Union No. 2 Supplemental Pension Fund, Trustees of the Indiana State Council of Roofers Health and Welfare Fund, Trustees of the Roofers and Waterproofers Research and Education Joint Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
Sancar Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Trustees of the Indiana State Council of Roofers Health and Welfare Fund v. Brand Industrial Services Inc et al
as 4:2021cv00035
Defendant:
BRANDSAFWAY INDUSTRIES LLC and BRAND INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, INC.,
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Indiana State Council of Roofers Health and Welfare Fund
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Trustees of the Indiana State Council of Roofers Health and Welfare Fund v. American Star Painting Company, LLC
as 2:2021cv00850
Defendant:
American Star Painting Company, LLC
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Indiana State Council of Roofers Health and Welfare Fund
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Trustees of the Indiana State Council of Roofers Health and Welfare Fund v. Robinson Painting & Accoustical Co. Inc.
as 4:2021cv00007
Defendant:
ROBINSON PAINTING & ACCOUSTICAL CO., INC., and Robinson Painting & Accoustical Co. Inc.
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Indiana State Council of Roofers Health and Welfare Fund
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
National Roofing Industry Pension Plan et al v. Jourdain Roofing Company
as 4:2020cv01578
Plaintiff:
National Roofing Industry Pension Plan, United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers and Allied Workers, Local Union No. 2, AFL-CIO, Trustees of Indiana State Council of Roofers Health and Welfare Fund and others
Defendant:
Jourdain Roofing Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Trustees of the Indiana State Council of Roofers Health and Welfare Fund et al v. McDowell Roofing LLC
as 4:2020cv00015
Defendant:
McDowell Roofing, L.L.C. and McDowell Roofing LLC
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Indiana State Council of Roofers Health and Welfare Fund, Trustees of the Roofers and Waterproofers Research and Education Joint Trust Fund and Trustees of the National Roofing Industry Pension Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
