Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Ingrid Henriquez-de Palma v. Todd Blanche
as 26-1955
Petitioner: INGRID VANESA HENRIQUEZ-DE PALMA and B.A.P.H.
Respondent: TODD BLANCHE, Acting Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv04306
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
More v. Durose et al
as 9:2026cv80836
Plaintiff: Sese More
Defendant: Natasha Durose, Ingrid Nalval, Chef Emile and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00241
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv24757
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv24746
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Abbott v. County of Kern et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2026cv05304
Plaintiff: Michael Abbott
Defendant: County of Kern, City of Ridgecrest, Eric Santos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv24739
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Washington v. State of Connecticut
as 26-1869
Defendant: MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., STATE OF CONNECTICUT, KEVIN GENE DUBAY and others
Plaintiff: ANNETTE LOIS WASHINGTON and BASIL CLIFTON WASHINGTON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv24740
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?