Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Michael Ellison v. Inova Health System Foundation
as 23-263
Petitioner:
MICHAEL ELLISON, ANDREA GRAHAM and ARIN JENKINS, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Respondent:
INOVA HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION and INOVA HEALTH CARE SERVICES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Nelson v. INOVA Health System Foundation dba INOVA Health System
as 1:2022cv00590
Plaintiff:
Sandria A Nelson
Defendant:
INOVA Health System Foundation dba INOVA Health System
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01386
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01327
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Money et al v. INOVA Health System
as 1:2020cv01218
Plaintiff:
Jason Money and Kadriana Heishman
Defendant:
INOVA Health System
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Patient Engagement Advisors, LLC v. INOVA Health System
as 1:2019cv01240
Plaintiff:
Patient Engagement Advisors, LLC
Defendant:
INOVA Health System
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kenneth Henderson v. Fairfax-Falls Church CSB
as 19-1040
Defendant / Appellee:
INOVA HEALTH SYSTEM, FAIRFAX COUNTY GOVERNMENT and FAIRFAX-FALLS CHURCH COMMUNITY SERVICES BOARD
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH KARL HENDERSON
Inova Health System Foundation v. Premier Purchasing Partners, L.P.
as 1:2018cv01060
Plaintiff:
Inova Health System Foundation
Defendant:
Premier Purchasing Partners, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00825
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
