Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 110
Bristol Bay Area Health Corporation v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 3:2019cv00305
Defendant: Abbott Laboratories, Beverly Sackler, Mallinckrodt, LLC and others
Plaintiff: Bristol Bay Area Health Corporation
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Richard Di Donato, et al v. John Kapoor, et al
as 19-80135
Defendant: MICHAEL L. BABICH, ALEC BURLAKOFF, INSYS THERAPEUTICS INCORPORATED and others
Not Yet Classified: RICHARD DI DONATO, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated and JOHN N. KAPOOR
Plaintiff: CLARK MILLER
City Of San Jose v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 5:2019cv04529
Defendant: McKesson Corporation, Endo Health Solutions, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff: City Of San Jose and The People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Tucson Medical Center v. Purdue Pharma LP et al
as 4:2019cv00358
Defendant: Purdue Frederick Company Incorporated, Purdue Pharma LP, Abbott Laboratories and others
Plaintiff: Tucson Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
City of Chula Vista, California v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 3:2019cv01115
Defendant: Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P., McKesson Corporation and others
Plaintiff: City of Chula Vista, California
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Lytton Band of Pomo Indians v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv03224
Defendant: McKesson Corporation, Actavis Pharma, Inc. f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff: LYTTON BAND OF POMO INDIANS
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Tule River Indian Tribe of California v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv03222
Defendant: McKesson Corporation, Actavis Pharma, Inc. f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff: TULE RIVER INDIAN TRIBE OF CALIFORNIA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Prescott, City of v. Allergan PLC et al
as 3:2019cv08165
Defendant: Actavis Incorporated, Purdue Frederick Company Incorporated, Beverly Sackler and others
Plaintiff: Prescott, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
City of Pocatello v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 4:2019cv00189
Defendant: Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Amerisourcebergen Corporation, Janssen Research & Development, LLC and others
Plaintiff: City of Pocatello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
County of Yolo, et al., v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00813
Defendant: Actavis Pharma, Inc., Allergan PLC, Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: County of Yolo, The People of the State of California and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?