Cases 1 - 10 of 29
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SHEET METAL, AIR, RAIL & TRANSPORTATION WORKERS, SHEET METAL WORKERS LOCAL 19 v. INDEPENDENT BALANCING COMPANY
as 2:2024cv01981
Plaintiff:
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SHEET METAL, AIR, RAIL & TRANSPORTATION WORKERS, SHEET METAL WORKERS LOCAL 19
Defendant:
INDEPENDENT BALANCING COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 27 U.S.C. § 185 Enforcement of Arbitration Award
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SHEET METAL, AIR, RAIL & TRANSPORTATION WORKERS, SHEET METAL WORKERS LOCAL 19
as 2:2024cv01694
Plaintiff:
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SHEET METAL, AIR, RAIL & TRANSPORTATION WORKERS, SHEET METAL WORKERS LOCAL 19
Cause Of Action: 27 U.S.C. § 185 Enforcement of Arbitration Award
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SHEET METAL, AIR, RAIL & TRANSPORTATION WORKERS, SHEET METAL WORKERS LOCAL 19 v. GENERAL AIRE SYSTEMS
as 2:2024cv01696
Plaintiff:
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SHEET METAL, AIR, RAIL & TRANSPORTATION WORKERS, SHEET METAL WORKERS LOCAL 19
Defendant:
GENERAL AIRE SYSTEMS
Cause Of Action: 27 U.S.C. § 185 Enforcement of Arbitration Award
ANGUS v. INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SHEET METAL AIR RAIL TRANSPORTATION WORKERS
as 1:2023cv03692
Plaintiff:
DIANA ANGUS
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SHEET METAL AIR RAIL TRANSPORTATION WORKERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
KEOWN v. INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SHEET METAL AIR RAIL TRANSPORTATION WORKERS
as 1:2023cv03570
Plaintiff:
DAVID KEOWN and DIANA ANGUS
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SHEET METAL AIR RAIL TRANSPORTATION WORKERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers et al v. BNSF Railway Company
as 3:2023cv05012
Plaintiff:
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail & Transportation Workers - Mechanical and Engineering Department and International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, District 19
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act
W.G./Welch Mechanical Contractors, LLC v. International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail & Transportation Workers, Local Union 100-Sheet Metal Division
as 8:2022cv02296
Plaintiff:
WG/Welch Mechanical Contractors, LLC
Defendant:
International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail & Transportation Workers, Local Union 100-Sheet Metal Division, Richard Labille, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail & Transportation Workers, Transportation Division et al
as 1:2021cv05502
Plaintiff:
Union Pacific Railroad Company and Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
Defendant:
International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail & Transportation Workers, Transportation Division, Roy Davis, Luke EDINGTON and others
Petitioner:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SHEET METAL, AIR, RAIL & TRANSPORTATION WORKERS, SHEET METAL WORKERS LOCAL 19 v. E.J. DeSeta Company, Inc.
as 2:2021cv00034
Defendant:
E.J. DeSeta Company, Inc.
Plaintiff:
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SHEET METAL, AIR, RAIL & TRANSPORTATION WORKERS, SHEET METAL WORKERS LOCAL 19
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SHEET METAL, AIR, RAIL & TRANSPORTATION WORKERS, SHEET METAL WORKERS LOCAL 19 v. A&T EQUIPMENT TRANSPORT/INSTALLS, LLC, et al.
as 2:2020cv05163
Defendant:
A&T EQUIPMENT TRANSPORT/INSTALLS, LLC doing business as RELIANT COMMERCIAL KITCHEN INSTALLERS agent of A&T SOLUTIONS agent of ATS INSTALLERS, A&T EQUIPMENT TRANSPORT/INSTALLS, LLC doing business as RELIANT COMMERCIAL KITCHEN INSTALLERS also known as A&T SOLUTIONS also known as ATS INSTALLERS, A&T SOLUTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SHEET METAL, AIR, RAIL & TRANSPORTATION WORKERS, SHEET METAL WORKERS LOCAL 19
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
