Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 197
The Belt Railway Company of Chicago v. International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail, and Transportation Workers - Transportation Division We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv01395
Plaintiff: The Belt Railway Company of Chicago
Defendant: International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail, and Transportation Workers - Transportation Division
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act
International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers - Transportation Division v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 1:2024cv02387
Plaintiff: International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers - Transportation Division
Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Railway Labor Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00082
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail, and Transportation Workers Local Union No. 33 v. Law Heating and Cooling, LLC
as 2:2023cv04037
Plaintiff: International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail, and Transportation Workers Local Union No. 33
Defendant: Law Heating and Cooling, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Assoc.of Sheet Metal Workers, etc. v. K.C. Southern Railway
as 23-3483
Plaintiff / Appellee: International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail, and Transportation Workers, Transportation Division, Cuyahoga, OH
Defendant / Appellant: The Kansas City Southern Railway Company
Type: Labor Railway Labor
International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail, and Transportation Workers Local Union No. 33 v. Law Heating and Cooling, LLC
as 1:2023cv00792
Petitioner: International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail, and Transportation Workers Local Union No. 33
Respondent: Law Heating and Cooling, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Assoc.of Sheet Metal Workers, etc. v. K.C. Southern Railway
as 23-3332
Plaintiff / Appellee: International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail, and Transportation Workers, Transportation Division, Cuyahoga, OH
Defendant / Appellant: The Kansas City Southern Railway Company
Type: Labor Railway Labor
Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers Pension Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada et al v. Hammond Sheet Metal Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv08736
Plaintiff: Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers Pension Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada, Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers Health Plan of Southern California, Arizona and Nevada, Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers Local 88 Section 401(k) Plan and others
Defendant: Hammond Sheet Metal Inc, Gary Thomas Clutts and Cynthia Eileen Clutts
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers - Transportation Division et al v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 1:2021cv01870
Plaintiff: International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers, Transportation Division, Smart-TD GCA-680, Smart-TD GCA-687 and others
Counter Defendant: Smart-TD General Committee of Adjustments GO-169
Defendant: Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Railway Labor Act
International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers - Transportation Division v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 1:2023cv05075
Plaintiff: International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers - Transportation Division
Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Railway Labor Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?