Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Ghalem et al v. Progress Software Company et al
as MA/1:23-CV-12300
Plaintiff: Ghalem, Hadj Ghalem and Martin Foth Willmann
Defendant: Progress Software Company, Ipswitch, Inc. and UMass Chan Medical School
Ghalem et al v. Progress Software Company et al
as 1:2023cv12300
Plaintiff: Hadj Ghalem and Martin Foth Willmann
Defendant: Progress Software Company, Ipswitch, Inc. and UMass Chan Medical School
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Strucke et al v. Midland Financial Co et al
as OKW/5:23-CV-00782
Plaintiff: Strucke and Darryl Strucke
Defendant: Midland Financial Co, Ipswitch Inc and Progress Software Corporation
Strucke et al v. Midland Financial Co et al
as 5:2023cv00782
Plaintiff: Darryl Strucke
Defendant: Midland Financial Co, Ipswitch Inc and Progress Software Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Reese et al v. Ipswitch, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv11610
Plaintiff: Nakia Reese and Stephanie Pool
Defendant: Ipswitch, Inc. and Progress Software Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Reese et al v. Ipswitch, Inc. et al
as MA/1:23-CV-11610
Plaintiff: Reese
Defendant: Ipswitch, Inc
Pipes v. Ipswitch, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv11394
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER PIPES, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and Christopher Pipes
Defendant: IPSWITCH, INC. and PROGRESS SOFTWARE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Pipes v. Ipswitch, Inc. et al
as MA/1:23-CV-11394
Plaintiff: Pipes
Defendant: Ipswitch, Inc
Uniloc USA, Inc. et al v. Ipswitch, Inc.
as 6:2013cv00367
Plaintiff: Uniloc USA, Inc. and Uniloc Luxembourg S.A.
Defendant: Ipswitch, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
InNova Patent Licensing, LLC v. Ipswitch, Inc.
as 2:2012cv00366
Plaintiff: InNova Patent Licensing, LLC
Defendant: Ipswitch, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?