Cases 1 - 10 of 78
Rodriguez, Jr. v. Tommy's Express, LLC
as 7:2026cv00034
Plaintiff:
Israel Rodriguez, Jr.
Defendant:
Tommy's Express, LLC and Broderick Chapman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Rodriguez v. USA
as 4:2026cv00027
Petitioner:
Israel Rodriguez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 17.451 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS et al
as 7:2025cv00499
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
17.451 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, Felix Luera Ranch, Ltd., Unknown Heirs of Blas Farias and others
Claimant:
AMEIDA SALINAS STARR COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR-COLLECTOR, Annabell R. Garcia, Roma ISD Tax Assessor/Collector, Starr County, Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358 Land Condemnation
Rodriguez v. Hopper et al
as 1:2025cv01046
Plaintiff:
Jose Israel Rodriguez
Defendant:
Joseph Hopper and Mountain Central, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Rodriguez v. Hopper et al
as 5:2025cv00738
Plaintiff:
Jose Israel Rodriguez
Defendant:
Joseph Hopper and Mountain Central, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Davis (PS) v. Jaji et al
as 1:2024cv03457
Defendant:
Israel Rodriguez, Rabatunde Jaji, Michael Stratton and others
Plaintiff:
Lamar Delray Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. URS Midwest, Inc., et al.
as 24-2969
Plaintiff:
ISRAEL RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
URS MIDWEST, INC. and UNITED ROAD SERVICES, INC.
Gardner v. Rodriguez, et al.
as 24-2760
Plaintiff:
PENNY GARDNER
Defendant:
ISRAEL RODRIGUEZ and STATE OF WASHINGTON
Gardner v. Rodriguez, et al.
as 24-2418
Plaintiff:
PENNY GARDNER, formerly known as Penny Rodriguez
Defendant:
ISRAEL RODRIGUEZ and STATE OF WASHINGTON, Acting through and doing business as The Washington Health Care Authority
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
