Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Rodriguez v. Barber et al
as 5:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Ivan Rodriguez
Defendant:
John Barber and Randall Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv22612
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
RODRIGUEZ v. TRAY et al
as 2:2021cv03494
Plaintiff:
IVAN RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
TROOPER EUGENE TRAY, TROOPER MATTHEW ROSS, TROOPER JASON KESSER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00771
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Undetermined:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Nicolas Aquino v. County of Monterey Sheriff's D, et al
as 16-16815
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NICOLAS AQUINO
Defendant - Appellant:
COUNTY OF MONTEREY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and IVAN RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
DAVID MURRAY
Aquino v. County of Monterey Sheriff's Department et al
as 5:2014cv03387
Plaintiff:
Nicolas Aquino
Defendant:
County of Monterey Sheriff's Department , Ivan Rodriguez and David Murray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Neat v. City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv03011
Plaintiff:
Kendell Neat
Defendant:
City of New York , Ivan Rodriguez and John/Jane Doe(s) #'s1-3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holguin v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv06785
Plaintiff:
Othoniel Holguin
Defendant:
The City of New York, Angel Daliz, Andre McNulty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Derieux v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv06379
Plaintiff:
Reynaldo Derieux
Defendant:
The City of New York , Andre McNulty, Undercover Detective C-0093 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv01790
Plaintiff:
Lavell Jones
Defendant:
The City of New York , Ivan Rodriguez, John Doe and Richard Roe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
