Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Earl Duffie El v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2023cv09415
Plaintiff:
Earl Duffie El
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles, Oscar Rangel Salinas, Austin J Garza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mario Louis Navarro v. Blair, et al
as 5:2020cv01073
Defendant:
Ms. C. Moreno, Daivd B. Long, D. Alvarez and others
Plaintiff:
Mario Louis Navarro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Bland v. CA Dept. of Corrections & Rehabilitation, et al.
as 1:2018cv01357
Defendant:
J. Swanson, Scott Kernan, Christian Pfeiffer and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Davis Bland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jacques v. Lopez, Jr. et al
as 1:2016cv01289
Plaintiff:
Michael Jacques
Defendant:
J. Lopez, Jr., T. Vasquez, P. Athie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Law v. Boykin, et al.,
as 1:2016cv02292
Plaintiff:
Carlos Gilbert Law
Defendant:
Boykin, J. Membrere and J. Garza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foster v. Akin et al
as 1:2014cv01222
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Foster
Defendant:
T. Akin, R. Tolson, D. Goss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prock v. Warden, Kern Valley State Prison, et al.
as 1:2013cv01572
Plaintiff:
Matthew B Prock
Defendant:
Warden, Kern Valley State Prison, D Davey, C. Pfeiffer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cervantes v. Adams et al
as 1:2011cv00387
Plaintiff:
Jose H. Cervantes
Defendant:
Darrel G. Adams, Susan Hubbart, J. Garza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter v. Secretary of Adult & Youth Authority, et al.
as 1:2011cv00248
Plaintiff:
Leroy Dewitt Hunter
Defendant:
Secretary of Adult & Youth Authority, Director of Corrections and Rehabilitation, K. Harrington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter v. Harrington, et al.
as 1:2011cv00237
Plaintiff:
Leroy Dewitt Hunter
Defendant:
K. Harrington, M.D. Biter, T. Arlitz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
