Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Woodward v. Gormsen et al
as 3:2022cv03419
Plaintiff:
Brodie Woodward
Defendant:
Christian Gormsen, Joshua Makower, Douglas J. Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Wolfson v. Gormsen et al
as 3:2021cv09342
Plaintiff:
Barbara Wolfson
Defendant:
Christian Gormsen, JOSHUA MAKOWER, Douglas J Hughes and others
Edward Thomas v. CDCR, et al
as 20-15300
Defendant / Appellee:
J. CORONA, L. BAUTISTA-MARTINEZ, M. CERVANTES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWARD THOMAS
Raymond Whitall v. S.D. Gutierrez, et al
as 19-17345
Defendant:
O. VALLES, Correctional Officer, R. QUINTERO, Correctional Counselor II/Correctional Captain, H. AYALA, Badge #69024, Correctional Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAYMOND RICHARD WHITALL
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM MUNIZ, Warden, J. CABALLERO, Badge #83634, Correctional Officer, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION and others
Thomas v. California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation et al
as 5:2019cv03728
Defendant:
T. J. Smith, J. Vasquez, B. Bebee and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hughes v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2019cv00899
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Andrea J. Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g
Robert Alves v. Dennis Vega, et al
as 17-15850
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT ALVES
Defendant - Appellee:
DENNIS VEGA, BRIAN MCCLELLEN, RICKY FERNANDEZ and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2017cv00041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626
Cornejo v. CDCR Employees et al
as 1:2016cv05306
Plaintiff:
Efrain Cornejo
Defendant:
CDCR Employees, D. Shaltry, V. Pato and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diaz v. Mirabal et al
as 5:2016cv04217
Plaintiff:
Enrique Diaz
Defendant:
V. Mirabal, R. Kessler, J. Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
