Cases 1 - 10 of 177
Thompson v. Radtke et al
as 2:2024cv00507
Plaintiff:
David J Thompson
Defendant:
D Radtke, A DeGroot, Sgt Friedi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Crisci
as 2:2024cv00486
Plaintiff:
David J Thompson
Defendant:
CO Crisci
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jason Tyrrell, et al v. Richard Robinson, et al
as 24-1266
Plaintiff:
JASON ALAN TYRRELL and ALVIN DWAYNE FRAZIER
Defendant:
RICHARD LEE ROBINSON, WILLIAM CHARLES VALKEMA, CRESTON JEROME HICKS and others
Williams v. Thompson et al
as 2:2023cv00945
Plaintiff:
Ryan Keith Williams
Defendant:
J. Thompson, M. Ledoux, J. Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Prummell, et al
as 2:2023cv00833
Plaintiff:
Ryan Keith Williams
Defendant:
Bill Prummell, Tamantha Poulton, Beverly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv17397
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Thompson v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2023cv00153
Petitioner:
Phillip J. Thompson
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Walker et al v. New York State Department of Correction and Community Supervision et al
as 9:2023cv00206
Plaintiff:
Carlton Walker and Jermell Mclean
Defendant:
New York State Department of Correction and Community Supervision, Anthony J. Annucci, Brian Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
