Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Hardy et al v. White et al
as 1:2021cv00487
Plaintiff:
Darren E Hardy and Marcus J Thompson
Defendant:
Carrigan & Sons Trucking Inc, Jospeh Sanford White and Joseph Sanford White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Armbrester v. Jacksonville, City of et al
as 2:2013cv00935
Plaintiff:
Ronald Armbrester
Defendant:
Jacksonville, City of, Jacksonville Police Chief, Jeremy J. Penny and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thompson v. Greyhound Lines, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00576
Plaintiff:
Theodore J. Thompson
Defendant:
Greyhound Lines, Inc., Colonial Trailways, Inc. and Terry Reeves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Broadhead v. Hooteh et al
as 4:2012cv00799
Plaintiff:
James Broadhead
Defendant:
J Hooteh, R Hooteh, W Howard and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Francis et al v. Morgan Keegan & Co Inc et al
as 2:2010cv01624
Plaintiff:
J Timothy Francis , Frances N Francis and James L North
Defendant:
Morgan Keegan & Co Inc, MK Holding Inc, Carter E Anthony and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Duncan et al v. Morgan Keegan & Co, Inc et al
as 2:2010cv01563
Plaintiff:
Walter C Duncan , Dice K Lineberry , Francis H Kohn and others
Defendant:
Morgan Keegan & Co, Inc, MK Holding, Inc, Carter E Anthony and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Schilleci et al v. Morgan Keegan & Company Inc et al
as 2:2009cv01485
Plaintiff:
Donald J Schilleci, Donald J Schilleci, Mary Anna Schilleci and others
Defendant:
Morgan Keegan & Company Inc, Morgan Keegan & Company Inc, Morgan Keegan & Company Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 - Petition for Removal: SEC Act
Thompson v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 3:2009cv01261
Plaintiff:
Clarence J. Thompson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
