Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Arroyo v. McGinley et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv01083
Plaintiff: Bryant Arroyo
Defendant: Thomas S. McGinley, Deputy J. Gibson, Robert Marsh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. THE PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2022cv01382
Plaintiff: Dashaan R. Smith
Defendant: The PA Department of Corrections, Superintendent T. Mcginley, LT. Rice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. THE PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2022cv03530
Plaintiff: DASHAAN R. SMITH
Defendant: THE PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SUPERINTENDENT T. MCGINLEY, LT. RICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SOUZA et al v. BRASS SADDLE, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00683
Plaintiff: JESSICA GOLDEN, CIELO JEAN GIBSON, ALANA SOUZA and others
Defendant: BETTY ANN BISACCA and BRASS SADDLE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
GIBSON v. USA
as 2:2016cv00867
Petitioner: JOHN J. GIBSON
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
GIBSON et al v. HOWARD et al
as 2:2015cv01278
Plaintiff: JAMES M. GIBSON and JUSTIN J. GIBSON
Defendant: NORMAN L. HOWARD, TROY RICE and REDSTONE TOWNSHIP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GIBSON v. THE BRACHFELD LAW GROUP, P.C.
as 2:2012cv01673
Plaintiff: ANTWON J. GIBSON
Defendant: THE BRACHFELD LAW GROUP, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
GIBSON v. ASTRUE
as 5:2012cv06097
Plaintiff: LORI J. GIBSON
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
GIBSON v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. et al
as 2:2011cv63560
Plaintiff: DANIEL J. GIBSON
Defendant: OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. , PITTSBURGH-CORNING CORPORATION , AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?