Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Daniel Gould v. William Churchwell, et al
as 17-13075
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL GOULD
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM CHURCHWELL, WARDEN NWFRC, J. HOLDEN, CAPT NWFRC, S. DUVALL, COL NWFRC and others
HANABURY v. BRYANT
as 3:2017cv00397
Plaintiff:
PAUL RAY HANABURY
Defendant:
R BRYANT, J HUTCHINS, J MCCABE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel Gould v. NWFRC Warden, et al
as 16-13421
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL GOULD
Defendant - Appellee:
NWFRC WARDEN, J. HOLDEN, Capt., NWFRC, S. DUVALL, Col., NWFRC and others
Carmody Torrance Sandak & Hennessey, LLP v. Hassett
as 3:2015cv01289
Plaintiff:
Carmody Torrance Sandak & Hennessey, LLP
Defendant:
John J. Hassett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peak Finance, LLC v. Hassett et al
as 2:2015cv01590
Defendant:
Theodore H Banzhaf, Judson W. Bibb, III, Timothy J. Hassett and others
Nominal Defendant:
HPEV, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Peak Finance, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
DANIEL GOULD V. WILLIAM CHURCHWELL et al
as 5:2013cv00386
Plaintiff:
DANIEL GOULD
Defendant:
WILLIAM CHURCHWELL, J HOLDEN, S DUVALL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gary Cummings v. Daniel Bond, et al
as 12-4155
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY CUMMINGS
Defendant:
DANIEL E. BOND
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK J. HASSETT
Cummings v. Bond et al
as 1:2012cv01539
Plaintiff:
Gary L. Cummings
Defendant:
Daniel E. Bond, Mark J. Hassett, Dennis Coyne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bannerjee v. John J. Hassett & Tuckerbrook Alternative Investments
as 1:2010cv10894
Plaintiff:
Sumanta Bannerjee
Defendant:
John J. Hassett & Tuckerbrook Alternative Investments
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
May, James, et al v. Shuttle Inc, et al
as 96-7233
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James May, Fredric B. Nickell, Ronald Baldwin and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Shuttle Inc., USAir, Inc., Citicorp and others
Amicus Curiae:
National Mediation Board
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
