Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Schwarz v. Sonoco Products Company et al
as 4:2019cv03447
Defendant:
Charlie Schmitt, Carolina Pines Regional Medical Center, Edwin B Pate and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon A Schwarz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shelley v. Stirling et al
as 4:2018cv02229
Plaintiff:
Bronson Shelley
Defendant:
Bryan P. Stirling and J Michael Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2016cv00533
Plaintiff:
James D Scott
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections , Robert Stevenson, III , Cecilia Reynolds and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hamm v. Jones et al
as 9:2015cv02552
Plaintiff:
Michael E Hamm
Defendant:
Tiffaney Jones , Dr Gothard and J Michael Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2014cv02269
Plaintiff:
George Phillips
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections , Robert Stevenson, III and J Michael Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Al-Amin v. South Carolina Dep't of Correction et al
as 0:2013cv01176
Plaintiff:
Raqib Abdul Al-Amin
Defendant:
South Carolina Dep't of Correction, Dennis Bush, Rhonda Sutton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. Pee Dee Benevolent Society Inc et al
as 4:2011cv02022
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Inc
Defendant:
Pee Dee Benevolent Society Inc, J Michael Timmons, Jr and Charles E Lamb
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0553
Michael v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 9:2009cv02565
Plaintiff:
Sandy J Michael
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Muhammad WKA Qadir v. Cooke et al
as 4:2008cv00498
Plaintiff:
Muhammad WKA Qadir
Defendant:
HL Cooke, John Doe, Unknown Defendants and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
