Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Keith Powell v. Secretary, Florida Department, et al
as 12-13509
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEITH J. POWELL
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and SANTA ROSA CI WARDEN
POWELL v. TUCKER et al
as 3:2012cv00189
Plaintiff:
KEITH J POWELL
Defendant:
KENNETH TUCKER and DAVID ELLIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00914
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Powell v. Board of County Commissioners et al
as 0:2010cv62015
Plaintiff:
Keith J. Powell
Defendant:
Board of County Commissioners, Broward County Commissioners, Government Center for Broward County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powell v. Seminole County Jail
as 1:2009cv00164
Plaintiff:
Michael J Powell
Defendant:
Seminole County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Powell v. Unknown
as 1:2009cv00140
Petitioner:
Michael J Powell
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Powell v. Geekie et al
as 5:2009cv00189
Plaintiff:
Michael J Powell
Defendant:
Aryn Grayel Gordon Geekie, North American Midway Entertainment - Canada Holding Inc and Canadian Midway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Powell v. State of Florida
as 0:2009cv60663
Plaintiff:
Keith J. Powell
Defendant:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Powell et al v. USA
as 8:2008cv01992
Plaintiff:
Calvin David Powell and Barbara J. Powell
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Powell v. Broward County Board of Commissioners et al
as 1:2008cv61082
Plaintiff:
Keith J. Powell
Defendant:
Broward County Board of Commissioners, Al Lamberti, H.R.S. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
