Cases 1 - 10 of 115
Smith v. BNSF Railway Company
as 1:2024cv01195
Plaintiff:
Brandon J. Smith
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Smith v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2024pq01325
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Annie J. Smith
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Chevron U.S.A. Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Goodloe v. Smith et al
as 3:2024cv50083
Plaintiff:
Ronald E. Goodloe
Defendant:
Officer J. Smith, Officer B. Disher, Inmate Artavis Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
Willie J. Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Wilson v. Wills et al
as 3:2023cv04066
Plaintiff:
Blake Wilson
Defendant:
Warden Wills, Lewey, Lt. Royster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sharkey v. County Of Cook et al
as 1:2023cv15030
Plaintiff:
Markees Sharkey
Defendant:
County Of Cook, Thomas Dart, J. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Torres et al
as 1:2023cv14676
Plaintiff:
Gregory J. Smith
Defendant:
Jorge Torres, Johnathan Landers, Jacob Juarez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Avlon Industries et al
as 1:2023cv05532
Defendant:
Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC, Avlon Industries, House of Cheatham, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Arbury J Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McArthur v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2023cv01790
Plaintiff:
Lucien McArthur
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Wexford Health Sources Inc, Doctor Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKay v. Smith et al
as 3:2023cv03159
Plaintiff:
Marcus McKay
Defendant:
J Smith and . Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
