Cases 1 - 10 of 237
Galea v. Luciano et al
as 1:2024cv00534
Plaintiff:
Joseph Galea
Defendant:
Juan R. Luciano, Michael S. Burke, Theodore Colbert, III and others
RS Real Estate Plus v. Jaime R. Sanchez et al
as 8:2024cv00496
Plaintiff:
RS Real Estate Plus
Defendant:
Jaime R. Sanchez, Ana Zuniga Moreno, Ermer J. Sanchez and others
Sanchez v. Abbott et al
as 1:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
Juan J. Sanchez
Defendant:
Diana Cruz, M. Machado, Shirley W. Buttz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Sanchez
as 24-2031
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
SHELIKY J. SANCHEZ
Brian Lee Freeman v. J. Deburg et al
as 5:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
J. Deburg, L. Sanchez, E. Holguin and others
Defendant:
Brian Lee Freeman
Counter Defendant:
J. Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Freeman v. Deburg et al
as 3:2023cv02371
Plaintiff:
Brian Lee Freeman
Defendant:
J Deburg, L Sanchez, E Holguin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Sanchez v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2023cv01148
Plaintiff:
Carla J Sanchez
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Jalieba v. Crim et al
as 5:2023cv00729
Plaintiff:
Paul Jalieba
Defendant:
Anthony Crim, Antonio Crim, K. K. Howle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sanchez v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 2:2023cv00167
Petitioner:
Juan J Sanchez
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Conrad James, Jr. v. Freedom Mortgage Corporation
as 23-13039
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CONRAD JOSEPH JAMES, JR. and CONRAD JAMES, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION
Amicus Curiae:
INGRID EAGLY, DAVID G. GUTIERREZ, MAE NGAI and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
