Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Reynolds v. MU Health Care et al
as 2:2020cv04081
Defendant:
Allen Lavender, MD Suzanne M King, MD Jason Shoemaker and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Paul Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAC Local Union 15 Welfare Fund et al v. John J. Smith Masonry Company
as 4:2020cv00013
Plaintiff:
BAC Local Union 15 Pension Fund, BAC Local Union 15 Welfare Fund, Donald J. Hunt and others
Defendant:
John J. Smith Masonry Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Smith v. Pash
as 4:2017cv00479
Petitioner:
Vernando J Smith
Respondent:
Ronda Pash
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv06034
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Smith v. Astrue
as 2:2012cv04316
Petitioner:
Donna J Smith
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Compton et al v. Merritt et al
as 6:2009cv03175
Plaintiff:
Douglas J. Compton, Mary Compton and Douglas Compton
Defendant:
Jack Merritt, James Arnott, Joe Meyerstrik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Smithkline Beecham Corporation
as 4:2009cv00254
Plaintiff:
Bobby J Smith
Defendant:
Smithkline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Killian Smith Architect + Associates, PC et al v. VOC Investments, LLC et al
as 2:2009cv04015
Plaintiff:
Killian Smith Architect + Associates, P.C. and Killian J Smith
Defendant:
VOC Investments, LLC, Columbia Associates Architecture & Interior Design, Inc. and Lake Professional Engineering Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Smith v. Sharpe et al
as 4:2009cv00089
Plaintiff:
Matthew J. Smith
Defendant:
Charles N. Sharpe, Joseph Moore and David Moss
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Smith v. Sharpe et al
as 4:2009cv00025
Defendant:
Charles N. Sharpe and Joseph Moore
Plaintiff:
Matthew J. Smith
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
