Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Alexander v. Myers et al
as 3:2022cv01195
Plaintiff:
John Alexander
Defendant:
B. Myers, E. Speck, D. Wiser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CONLIN & CO., LLC v. TAYLOR et al
as 2:2019cv02451
Plaintiff:
CONLIN & CO., LLC
Defendant:
JOEL TAYLOR and J. TAYLOR SECURITY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TAYLOR v. SOMMERS et al
as 2:2017cv02621
Petitioner:
GEORGE J. TAYLOR, III
Respondent:
JACK SOMMERS, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00128
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Taylor v. United States et al
as 1:2013cv01356
Plaintiff:
Everette J. Taylor
Defendant:
United States , Ronnie Holt, Angela P. Dunbar and others
Mediator:
Mediator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. TAYLOR
as 2:2012cv02783
Petitioner:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Respondent:
JOSEPH J. TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ANDERSON v. WILKINSBURG POLICE DEPT et al
as 2:2012cv00468
Plaintiff:
BRIAN L. ANDERSON
Defendant:
WILKINSBURG POLICE DEPT, OPHELIA COLEMAN, MICHAEL CATANZARO, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR v. VISINSKY et al
as 3:2012cv00046
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH J. TAYLOR
Defendant:
JOSEPH W. VISINSKY, DENISE R. THOMAS, JACK DEPNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv58305
Plaintiff:
ALBERT J TAYLOR
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
CARR v. PHILADELPHIA MENTAL HEALTH CENTER, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv06721
Plaintiff:
JOEL CARR
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA MENTAL HEALTH CENTER, INC., KEREY RUGGIERO and MICHAEL J. TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
