Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Trustees of the Chicago Painters and Decorators Pension Fund et al v. M J Anderson Interiors, Inc.
as 1:2011cv05085
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Chicago Painters and Decorators Pension Fund , Trustees of the Chicago Painters and Decorators Health and Welfare Fund , Trustees of the Chicago Painters and Decorators Deferred Savings Fund and others
Defendant:
M J Anderson Interiors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
v. Anderson et al
as 7:2011cv01954
Plaintiff:
Paul J. Anderson
Defendant:
Bloom Hochberg & Co., P.C. and Irwin Hochberg
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Trustees of the Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Fund, et al. v. M J Anderson Interiors, Inc.
as 1:2009cv04991
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Fund, et al.
Defendant:
M J Anderson Interiors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
White v. Texas Department of Public Safety et al
as 4:2008cv00619
Plaintiff:
Judith Ann White
Defendant:
Texas Department of Public Safety and J. Anderson
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Anderson v. Access Business Group, LLC
as 1:2008cv00568
Plaintiff:
Donna J. Anderson
Defendant:
Access Business Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Nowak et al v. City of New York et al
as 7:2007cv00612
Plaintiff:
Paul E. Abate, Jr., Marisa E. Abbriano, Frank Adino and others
Defendant:
City of New York, Fire Department of the City of New York, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Erven, et al v. Blandin Paper Co, et al
as 0:2004cv00115
Plaintiff:
Randy Erven, Michael Richards, Richard Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Robinson, et al v. Eastman Kodak
as 6:2002cv06204
Plaintiff:
Lawrence T Heinsler, Stephen M. Ellis, Thomas L. Braden and others
Special Master:
Esq. Steven V Modica
Defendant:
Eastman Kodak Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
