Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Arnold v. Lockheed Martin Corp. et al
as 1:2022cv00057
Plaintiff:
Paul J. Arnold, Sr.
Defendant:
Lockheed Martin Corp. and John Doe, Inc.
Cross Claimant:
Glencore Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Terry Simonton, Jr. v. Megan Ryland-Tanner, et al
as 20-1768
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES GRUMBINE, DAVID J. ARNOLD, JR. and MEGAN E. RYLAND-TANNER
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERRY SIMONTON, JR.
Simonton v. Ryland-Tanner et al
as 4:2019cv00528
Defendant:
David J. Arnold, Jr., Megan E. Ryland-Tanner and James Grumbine
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Simonton, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McElroy v. McElroy et al
as 1:2017cv00230
Plaintiff:
Patrick B. McElroy
Defendant:
Steffani E. McElroy, Lebanon County, Kelli Scorzetti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman May v. John Tywalk, et al
as 16-1725
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREEMAN WILLIAM MAY, PADRP
Defendant:
JOHN C. TYWALK, DAVID J. ARNOLD, JR., District Attorney, STEWART LEV, Esquire and others
Arnold v. Colvin
as 3:2015cv02103
Plaintiff:
Linda J. Arnold
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Bryant v. Sleichter et al
as 1:2013cv00489
Plaintiff:
Kenneth James Bryant, Jr.
Defendant:
Richard B. Sleichter, David J. Arnold, David S. Keller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARNOLD et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv66429
Plaintiff:
PATRICK J. ARNOLD and BETTY ARNOLD
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., EASTERN MAGNESIA TALC, FLEXITALLIC, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ARNOLD et al v. AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION
as 2:2009cv92209
Plaintiff:
MARJORIE M ARNOLD, MARJORIE M ARNOLD, DANIEL J ARNOLD and others
Defendant:
AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Whitman v. Arnold
as 1:2009cv00566
Plaintiff:
Henry F. Whitman, III
Defendant:
David J. Arnold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
