Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Carroll v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv00963
Petitioner:
James J Carroll
Respondent:
UNITED STATES and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
CARROLL v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2022cv00523
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. CARROLL
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
United States of America v. Carroll
as 2:2020cv00239
Defendant:
William J Carroll
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
CARROLL v. ALVEY
as 3:2018cv00177
Respondent:
KATHY ALVEY
Petitioner:
J. CARROLL and JORDAN CARROLL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Blue Island Police Department et al v. Bey
as 1:2018cv02403
Plaintiff:
Blue Island Police Department, Sluzewicz Highwayman, State Of Illinois and others
Defendant:
El-Haj Malik Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ZAVODNIK et al v. CARROLL et al
as 1:2014cv00995
Defendant:
THOMAS J. CARROLL, ADAM C. COBB, KEVIN DEMPSEY and others
Plaintiff:
GERSH ZAVODNIK and TATIANA ZAVODNIK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carmichael v. Triad Financial Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv00283
Plaintiff:
Kimberley R Carmichael
Defendant:
Triad Financial Corporation, Douglas J Carroll, Jr, Joshua J Brady and others
Movant:
Desiree R Carmichael
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PAMELA SMITH v. SGT. M. VUJIC #2600 et al
as 1:2012cv01089
Plaintiff:
Pamela Smith
Defendant:
M Vujic , J. Carroll , E. Saldana and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKenzie Morrow v. Edward May, et al
as 12-1329
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MCKENZIE MORROW
Defendant - Appellee:
EDWARD J. MAY, EDWARD J. CARROLL, SHAWN J. PICKETT and others
SABR Mortgage Loan 2008-1 REO Subsidiary-1 LLC v. Carroll et al
as 1:2011cv01265
Plaintiff:
SABR Mortgage Loan 2008-1 REO Subsidiary-1 LLC
Defendant:
Ericka J Carroll and Tyon R Mason
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
