Cases 1 - 9 of 9
M&T Capital and Leasing Corp. v. Los Paisanos Autobuses Inc.
as 3:2023cv00032
Plaintiff:
M&T Capital and Leasing Corportaion and People
Defendant:
Los Paisanos Autobuses, Inc., Uriel J. Chavez and Uriel J. Chavira
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
RJ Chavez Inc v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co
as 2:2022cv03893
Plaintiff:
R J Chavez Inc and R J Chavez Inc doing business as El Paso
Defendant:
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co
Special Master:
Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Chavez v. Dallas Sheriff's Office
as 22-10622
Petitioner / Appellant:
Juan Pablo Chavez, also known as J. Chavez
Respondent / Appellee:
Dallas Sheriff's Office, DHS City of New York and Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Chavez v. Aslam et al
as 3:2021cv00892
Plaintiff:
Juan Pablo Chavez and J Chavez
Defendant:
Doe John, Murtaza Aslam, Luu Mac and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chavez v. Dallas Sheriffs Office et al
as 3:2021cv00891
Petitioner:
Juan Pablo Chavez and J Chavez
Respondent:
Dallas Sheriffs Office and DHS City of NY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Chavez et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association
as 3:2015cv00235
Plaintiff:
Jesus J. Chavez and Estela Martinez
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association and Beverly Mitrisin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00249
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080
Hatten v. Lafargue et al
as 2:2011cv00103
Plaintiff:
Timothy Hatten
Defendant:
Carl Lafargue, J P Young, J Michieli and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00241
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 701 Rehabilitation Act of 1973
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
