Cases 41 - 50 of 57
J & E Trucking, Inc. v. Protective Insurance Company et al
as 3:2011cv00562
Plaintiff:
J & E Trucking, Inc.
Defendant:
Protective Insurance Company and Cowan Systems, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Protective Insurance Company v. Compher et al
as 3:2011cv00183
Plaintiff:
Protective Insurance Company
Defendant:
Tracy S. Compher , Danny H. Raburn, J & E Trucking, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coleman v. State of Alabama et al
as 1:2011cv00050
Plaintiff:
Shaeffer Coleman
Defendant:
State of Alabama, J. Laird, Robin D. Scales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WRIGHT v. RUTHERFORD, et al
as 3:2010cv00292
Plaintiff:
GARY GENE WRIGHT
Defendant:
JOHN H RUTHERFORD, DESTINY JONES, K S BUSH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada v. Mcelroy et al
as 2:2010cv00488
Plaintiff:
Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
Defendant:
Elizabeth W. Mcelroy , Johnathan B. Piper and J. E. B.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Duke F. Cranford v. J. E. Thomas
as 10-10435
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DUKE F. CRANFORD
Defendant - Appellee:
J. E. THOMAS
Edwards v. Zenk et al
as 1:2009cv03010
Plaintiff:
Joseph Edwards
Defendant:
Micheal A Zenk, Mr Romero, J E Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Type:
Other Statutes
CRANFORD v. THOMAS
as 1:2009cv00224
Plaintiff:
DUKE F CRANFORD
Defendant:
J E THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Orbach Waters, LLC v. Edwards et al
as 2:2009cv00250
Plaintiff:
Orbach Waters, LLC
Defendant:
Edwin L. Edwards, Mark E. Edwards, Graham L. Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Corso v. City of Ocala et al
as 5:2008cv00380
Plaintiff:
David T. Corso
Defendant:
City of Ocala, Ocala Police Department, Ocala Police Officers and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
