Cases 1 - 10 of 13
MCALLISTER v. WINSTON-SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2019cv00013
Defendant:
SGT D. T. LENTZ, CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM, T. N. BRANCH and others
Plaintiff:
ANTON THURMAN MCALLISTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCALLISTER v. WINSTON-SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2018cv00745
Defendant:
RICHARD GOTTLIEB, SGT D. T. LENTZ, ELISABETH FROST DRESEL and others
Plaintiff:
ANTON THURMAN MCALLISTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Logan v. United States of America et al
as 5:2016ct03086
Plaintiff:
Joe A. Logan
Defendant:
United States of America, Charles Samuel, Jr., Warden Cross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOE v. WINSTON-SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2016cv00068
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEE EARL JOE
Defendant:
WINSTON-SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT and J. E. SWAIM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. Jones et al
as 5:2015cv00602
Plaintiff:
Arthur Orlandus Armstrong
Defendant:
B. K. Jones , J. E. Moore , W. L. Everett, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
JOE v. WINSTON SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2015cv00668
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEE EARL JOE
Defendant:
WINSTON SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT and J. E. SWAIM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Poole v. Gaston County et al
as 3:2015cv00309
Plaintiff:
Genger Poole
Defendant:
Gaston County, J. E. Knupp, W. P. Downey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FUNDERBURK v. DICKERSON et al
as 1:2014cv00675
Plaintiff:
CEDRIC DION FUNDERBURK
Defendant:
S. DICKERSON, J. S. FLOYD, J. E. SWAIM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davenport v. Elks et al
as 4:2013cv00181
Plaintiff:
Cartesea Davenport
Defendant:
Neil Elks , Lawrence Whaley , Eastern Carolina Medical Services, PLLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davenport v. Elks et al
as 5:2013ct03209
Plaintiff:
Cartesea Davenport
Defendant:
Neil Elks , Lawrence Whaley , Eastern Carolina Medical Services, PLLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
