Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Bey v. Elgin Police Department et al
as 1:2017cv01021
Plaintiff:
Kareem Bey
Defendant:
Elgin Police Department, J. Fennell and Officer #319
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blocker v. City of Chicago, The et al
as 1:2017cv00055
Plaintiff:
Aaron Blocker
Defendant:
City of Chicago, The, Garry McCarthy, Scott M Digrazia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. FENNELL et al
as 2:2015cv00102
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
THOMAS J. FENNELL and HEATHER M. HOAK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Bennett et al v. Murphy-Brown, LLC
as 7:2014cv00236
Plaintiff:
Tony Bennett , George Ester Fennell , Jerry Fennell, Sr. and others
Defendant:
Murphy-Brown, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James J. Fennell v. A.r. Wilfley & Sons, et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-77915
Defendant:
A.r. Wilfley & Sons
Plaintiff:
James J. Fennell
FENNELL v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2009cv77915
Plaintiff:
JAMES J. FENNELL and JAMES J. FENNELL
Defendant:
A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, ACF INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
DONALD J FENNELL et al v. A C & S INC et al
as 2:2007cv70846
Plaintiff:
DONALD J FENNELL, DONALD J FENNELL, BETTY A FENNELL and others
Defendant:
A C & S INC, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC, THE CELOTEX CORPORATION and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE PERSONAL INJURY SETTLEMENT TRUST, MANVILLE PERSONAL INJURY SETTLEMENT TRUST and MANVILLE PERSONAL INJURY SETTLEMENT TRUST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
FENNELL et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv63356
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM J. FENNELL and JUDITH FENNELL
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., THE CELOTEX CORPORATION, EAGLE PITCHER INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
