Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Rickey Benson v. J. Fields and/or Subordinates, et al
as 24-5377
Plaintiff:
RICKEY BENSON
Defendant:
J. FIELDS, Chief Jailer and/or subordinates and DEPUTY WRIGHT
Black v. Youth and Family Services of Enid et al
as 5:2024cv00292
Plaintiff:
Ryan Lee Black
Defendant:
Youth and Family Services of Enid, Melissa L Blanton, Garfield County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benson v. Fields and/or Subordinates et al
as 2:2024cv02144
Plaintiff:
Rickey Benson
Defendant:
J. Fields and/or Subordinates and Deputy Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fields v. Buckner
as 4:2023cv00036
Petitioner:
Daniel J Fields
Respondent:
Michele Buckner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fields v. United States of America
as 6:2020cv00726
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Dominique J. Fields
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
JONES v. KAINE et al
as 1:2018cv00612
Plaintiff:
MACEO JONES
Defendant:
THOMAS KAINE, ANGELA DUNBAR, LE MASTERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fields v. Heap et al
as 4:2017cv00212
Plaintiff:
Kelvin J. Fields
Defendant:
Meg Heap, John T. Wilcher, Martin G. Hilliard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SPEED v. JACKSON
as 5:2015cv00108
Plaintiff:
DANIAL ROBERT SPEED
Defendant:
M JACKSON, A OBRIAN, J FIELDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeAndrew Chambers v. Terre Fratesi, et al
as 15-5055
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEANDREW CHAMBERS
Defendant - Appellee:
TERRE FRATESI, Shelby County Assistant District Attorney General, LETIFIA COLE, Tennessee Department of Childrens Services, LATASHA SLOAN, Department of Childrens Services and others
Chambers v. Fratesi et al
as 2:2014cv02418
Plaintiff:
DeAndrew Chambers
Defendant:
Terre Fratesi, Letifia Cole, Latasha Sloan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
