Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv07352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Geary v. Parexel International Corporation et al
as 5:2019cv07322
Defendant:
Patrick J. Fortune, Douglas A. Batt, Eduard E. Holdener and others
Plaintiff:
William John Geary, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Washington v. Moore et al
as 4:2018cv06729
Defendant:
A Fregoso, Officer R. Moore, Dr. J. Fortune and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Levette Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Moore et al
as 3:2018cv06728
Defendant:
J. Fortune, A. Fregoso, R. Moore and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Levette Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Manning v. Parexel International Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv11376
Plaintiff:
Peter Manning
Defendant:
Parexel International Corporation, Josef H. Von Rickenbach, Maykin Ho and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Fischer v. Parexel International Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv11364
Plaintiff:
Catherine Fischer
Defendant:
Parexel International Corporation, A. Dana Callow, Jr., Patrick J. Fortune and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Scarantino v. Parexel International Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv11360
Plaintiff:
Louis Scarantino
Defendant:
Parexel International Corporation, A. Dana Callow, Jr., Patrick J. Fortune and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Maciel v. CDCR, et al.
as 1:2016cv00996
Plaintiff:
Armando Maciel
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, Secretary of CDCR, S. Frauenheim and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kahn v. Frauenhiem et al
as 1:2015cv01843
Plaintiff:
Mustaq Ali Kahn
Defendant:
S. Frauenhiem, Meet Boparai, O. Onyeje and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Fortune
as 1:2015cv01613
Plaintiff:
Vance Edward Johnson
Defendant:
J. Fortune
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
