Cases 31 - 40 of 50
Lovell Jones v. Department of Child Services, et al
as 18-1563
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOVELL J. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES and DAWN MOORE, Case Worker at Department of Child Services
JONES v. BRANCHVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 3:2018cv00005
Miscellaneou:
BRANCHVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Respondent:
BRANCHVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Petitioner:
IVAN J. JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JONES v. KREUGER
as 2:2017cv00497
Petitioner:
JERRY J. JONES
Respondent:
JEFFREY KREUGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jones v. United States of Amercia
as 3:2017cv03037
Petitioner:
Christopher J Jones
Respondent:
United States of Amercia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Crawford v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2017cv04026
Plaintiff:
Larry Crawford
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Craig Findley, Ed Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dawson v. Jones
as 2:2015cv01026
Plaintiff:
Adidas L Dawson
Defendant:
Antoinette J Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Oakbrook Mall et al
as 1:2015cv00554
Plaintiff:
Levert J Jones
Defendant:
Oakbrook Mall and CD Peacock Jewelry E.T.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Pinckneyville Correctional Center et al
as 3:2015cv00025
Plaintiff:
Levert J Jones
Defendant:
Donald Gaetz, Christina Brown and Dr Shah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Roeckeman et al
as 3:2014cv01013
Plaintiff:
Robert J Jones
Defendant:
Zack Roeckeman, S A Godinez, L. Guerrettaz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Cook County Jail et al
as 1:2014cv02186
Plaintiff:
David J. Jones
Defendant:
Cook County Jail, West Care Program and Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
