Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Brown v. Kings County DA et al
as 1:2022cv00688
Plaintiff:
Arthur Lamar Brown
Defendant:
Kings County DA, City of New York, NYC DOC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv07756
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Zulu v. Wells et al
as 9:2020cv00312
Defendant:
Kellen Denny, Adam Temer, Keith Bushey and others
Plaintiff:
Arkil LionKing Zulu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Starmel v. Tompkin et al
as 9:2020cv00089
Defendant:
J. LaPorte, Jane Does, Benjamin Locklin and others
Plaintiff:
Kendu P. Starmel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Little v. Soulia et al
as 9:2019cv00263
Plaintiff:
Charles Little, Clifton Little and Clifton X
Defendant:
J. LaPorte, Trevar A. Soulia, John Doe #5 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LAPORTE v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2018cv16661
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA J. LAPORTE
Defendant:
IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC ("IMERYS TALC"), JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Laporte, Troy v. Berryhill, Nancy
as 3:2017cv00602
Plaintiff:
Troy J. Laporte
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Huffman v. City of Rio Rancho et al
as 1:2014cv00217
Plaintiff:
Anthony Huffman
Defendant:
City of Rio Rancho , Rio Rancho Police Department , Carlos Railey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LaPorte et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 2:2011cv01768
Plaintiff:
Earl J LaPorte , Ericka LaPorte , Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc, Defendant's Liaison Counsel and Defendant's Lead Counsel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
