Cases 21 - 30 of 476
Kenneth Baptiste v. B. Martinez, et al
as 21-16357
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH EMANUEL BAPTISTE
Defendant / Appellee:
B. MARTINEZ, Correctional Counselor II, M. WYNN, Senior Staff Psychologist, J. HOWLIN, Chief of Mental Health and others
Defendant:
J. LEWIS, Deputy Director of Policy and Risk Management, of CDC Healthcare Services and S. HATTON, Warden
(PC) Bradford v. DeJesus et al
as 2:2021cv01411
Plaintiff:
Raymond Alford Bradford
Defendant:
S DeJesus, C Hernandez, Mary Dang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrison v. Singh et al
as 4:2021cv05431
Plaintiff:
James Ruhallah Harrison
Defendant:
Mandeep Singh, H. Tate, U. Baniga and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richards v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2021cv00865
Defendant:
L Brown, Unknown Livingston, Unknown Jimenez and others
Plaintiff:
Renee S Richards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jared Villery v. CDCR, et al
as 21-15425
Defendant:
M. PALLARES, OLEG LIFLYANDSKY, A. AITHAL and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ACOSTA, Dr., JAY JONES, RICHARD KENDALL and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JARED M. VILLERY
Larry Cortinas v. S. Gates, et al
as 21-15018
Defendant / Appellee:
S. GATES, C. SMITH, CARMEN FISCHER, Esquire and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LARRY WILLIAM CORTINAS
Danny Bell v. Scott Kernan, et al
as 20-16880
Defendant / Appellee:
C. SANTOS, Cal DOJ BCIA, FOX, Warden, CMF, CDCR, A. PAYAN, CDCR and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANNY BELL
Johnny Moore v. S. Hatton, et al
as 20-16701
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHNNY ANDREW MOORE
Defendant / Appellee:
M. BITER, S. HATTON, KIERNON and others
Damon Williams v. John Chau, et al
as 20-55875
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT WALKER, Physician, JOHN DOES, 1 -10, JOHN CHAU, Physician and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAMON WILLIAMS
Matthew Dennis v. Scott Kernan, et al
as 20-16392
Defendant / Appellee:
Y. MANSOUR, SCOTT KERNAN, B. LEE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW DENNIS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
