Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Lopez-Parker v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 5:2023cv00124
Petitioner:
Robert J. Lopez-Parker and Robert Jade Lopez-Parker
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Babos v. J. Lopez Trucking, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00213
Plaintiff:
Ara Babos
Defendant:
J. Lopez Trucking, LLC, DQ Logistics, DQ Freight Logistics, Inc. and others
Intervenor:
Christine Ambler, Peter Ambler and Frank Hunold
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Mark v. Cano et al
as 1:2022cv00075
Plaintiff:
Darrell Jacoby Mark
Defendant:
FNU Cano, J Lopez and K Saddler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. Collier et al
as 1:2021cv00069
Plaintiff:
Oliver King Hughes
Defendant:
A Merchant, A Mordica, J Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Session v. Giannotti et al
as 1:2020cv00116
Defendant:
FNU Giannotti, FNU Haines, FNU Odom and others
Plaintiff:
Tujuan Estaisyo Session
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Session v. TDCJ-CID
as 1:2020cv00048
Respondent:
J Lopez and TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Tujuan Estaisyo Session
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Grisham et al v. Valenciano et al
as 5:2020cv00387
Defendant:
Rene Valenciano, City of Olmos Park, A. Viera and others
Plaintiff:
James Everard and Christopher Grisham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buchanan v. Barnes et al
as 4:2020cv00241
Defendant:
Sargeant Oldnes, Detention Officer Laston, Detention Officer Crawford and others
Plaintiff:
John Anthony Buchanan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pugh v. Lopez et al
as 4:2019cv02194
Defendant:
E. Jacobs, A. Thompson, Chief of Office of Inspector General and others
Plaintiff:
Hoover Pugh, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maxwell v. Lott et al
as 1:2019cv00004
Plaintiff:
Marcus Maxwell
Defendant:
Crystal A. Reyes, John T Johnson, FNU Wells and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
