Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Brandon Fake, et al v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 24-1113
Plaintiff:
BRANDON L. FAKE, SUSAN B. FAKE and CAITLIN B. FAKE
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
FAKE et al v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2020cv01283
Defendant:
WILLIAM H. KETTERLINUS, BRIAN ZARALLO, ANITA N. BOTCHWAY and others
Plaintiff:
CAITLIN B. FAKE, SUSAN B. FAKE and BRANDON L. FAKE
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
BIRD v. DUN & BRADSTREET CORPORATION et al
as 2:2018cv14301
Defendant:
JUDITH D REINSDORF, JAMES N FERNANDEZ, RANDALL D. MOTT and others
Plaintiff:
William Bird
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stein v. The Dun & Bradstreet Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv01469
Defendant:
Anastassia Lauterbach, Judith A. Reinsdorf, James N. Fernandez and others
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Kirk v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01455
Defendant:
Anastassia Lauterbach, Dun & Bradstreet, Inc., Judith A. Reinsdorf and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Kirk
MANNING v. MERCATANTI, JR.
as 3:2014mc00011
Plaintiff:
EUGENE J. MANNING
Defendant:
LOUIS F. MERCATANTI, JR.
Halpert v. Zhang et al
as 1:2012cv01339
Defendant:
Davin A. Mackenzie, AsiaInfo-Linkage Inc., Steve Zhang and others
Plaintiff:
Philip Halpert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MANNING v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv55424
Plaintiff:
ERNEST J MANNING
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MANNING v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv36384
Plaintiff:
DENIS J MANNING
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
CATERBONE et al v. COUNTY OF LANCASTER et al
as 2:2008cv02983
Plaintiff:
STANLEY J. CATERBONE and ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Defendant:
COUNTY OF LANCASTER, LANCASTER COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE, DEBORAH MUZEREUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
