Cases 41 - 50 of 152
MARTIN et al v. DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv11852
Plaintiff:
ALLAN R. MARTIN and GLENDA J. MARTIN
Defendant:
DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO U.S. HOLDINGS, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv03543
Plaintiff:
Gloria J Martin
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin v. Equifax, Inc.
as 3:2017cv01246
Plaintiff:
Sean J. Martin
Defendant:
Equifax, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mims v. B&J Martin Inc et al
as 2:2017cv07324
Plaintiff:
Herbert Mims
Defendant:
B&J Martin Inc and Sparrows Offshore, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
MARTIN v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. et al
as 3:2017cv04111
Plaintiff:
GWENDOLYN J. MARTIN
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC., JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin et al v. Wisner et al
as 2:2017cv02264
Plaintiff:
Thomas J. Martin and Ariela Martin
Defendant:
Mark E. Wisner and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Martin v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2017cv02267
Plaintiff:
Gerald J. Martin
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
B&J Martin Inc v. Dempster
as 2:2017cv02059
Plaintiff:
B & J Martin, Inc.
Defendant:
Julius Dempster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Martin et al v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 3:2016cv00810
Plaintiff:
Kenneth E Martin and Kathy J Martin
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin v. Janssen Research & Development LLC, et al
as 2:2016cv16003
Plaintiff:
Barbara J. Martin
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
