Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Mendez v. Contreras et al
as 3:2022cv04677
Plaintiff:
Jovanny J. Mendez
Defendant:
C. Contreras, J. Taylor, Dr. J. Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. MCF - Moose Lake et al
as 0:2022cv01915
Plaintiff:
Eugene Laron Johnson
Defendant:
MCF - Moose Lake, Officer J. Mendez and Andy Turnboom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nicholas Anderson v. D. Scott, et al
as 22-16086
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NICHOLAS D. ANDERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
D. SCOTT, #2251, J. BERMUDEZ, #1832, K. SHORE, #0102, Lt. and others
Kelly v. Gates et al
as 4:2022cv03451
Plaintiff:
James Carl Kelly
Defendant:
S. Gates, S. Sawyer, M. Villanueva and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Paramo et al
as 3:2022cv00029
Plaintiff:
Brian Deverick Lewis
Defendant:
Daniel Paramo, A. Hammett, J. Mendez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
(PC) Riley v. Guerrero et al
as 1:2020cv01097
Defendant:
E. Garcia, J. Mendez, A. Guerrero and others
Plaintiff:
Shannon Riley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saldana v. Secretary Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv20178
Defendant:
Classification Offic K. Rupp, M Herring, J. Hultz and others
Plaintiff:
Eliseo Gonzalez Saldana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Riley v. Guerrero, et al.
as 1:2019cv01643
Defendant:
M. Garcia, J. Mendez, Guerrero and others
Plaintiff:
Shannon Riley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. Dade C.I. "Security Staffs" et al
as 3:2018cv01382
Defendant:
R. Gonzalez, J. Mendez, V. Guerera and others
Plaintiff:
Dannis C. Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Jones v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2018cv01537
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Jones
Defendant:
J. Zamora, A. Shaw, J. Mendez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
