Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Miller v. Juarez Cartel et al
as 2:2023mc00039
Defendant:
Juarez Cartel, Fuente Organization, Vincente Carillo and others
Plaintiff:
Howard J Miller
Cordova Contracting & Development LLC v. Miller et al
as 2:2020cv02285
Defendant:
Randy J Miller, Richard Lee, Bluebell International LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Cordova Contracting & Development LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv04503
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Alvin J Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Beitch v. Magnus et al
as 4:2018cv00067
Plaintiff:
Aaron Harvey Beitch
Defendant:
Chris Magnus, Justin Lane, Mickey Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Genzyme Incorporated, et al
as 2:2014cv00359
Plaintiff:
Carolyn J Miller
Defendant:
Genzyme Incorporated and Genzyme Biosurgery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller v. Miller
as 2:2012cv00680
Plaintiff:
Donald D Miller
Defendant:
Donna J Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01670
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Sidney v. Winn et al
as 4:2010cv00321
Plaintiff:
John Edward Sidney
Defendant:
Louis W Winn, B Katshor, C Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rodriguez v. Goodyear Police Department, et al.
as 2:2010cv00142
Plaintiff:
Jose Rodriguez
Defendant:
Goodyear Police Department , Michael J Miller , Unknown Fogelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. TLM Investments, P.L.C. et al
as 3:2009cv08131
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc., Cotillion Music, Inc., EMI Blackwood Music Inc. and others
Defendant:
TLM Investments, P.L.C., Linda A. McFarlin and Timothy J. Miller
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
