Cases 1 - 9 of 9
RUBIN v. MCGARRY et al
as 2:2020cv00313
Defendant:
MICHAEL H. MCGARRY, MARK C. KELLY, JAMES G. BERGES and others
Plaintiff:
BRENDA RUBIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LINDSAY et al v. MCGARRY et al
as 2:2020cv00253
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER H. LINDSAY, JR. and CHARLES R. BLACKBURN
Defendant:
MICHAEL H. MCGARRY, MARK C. KELLY, ROBERT RIPP and others
LEE v. MCGARRY et al
as 2:2020cv00075
Defendant:
MICHAEL H. MCGARRY, MARK C. KELLY, JAMES G. BERGES and others
Plaintiff:
L. COURTLAND LEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv05372
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
BROWN v. WOLF et al
as 2:2016cv01081
Plaintiff:
ALTON D. BROWN
Defendant:
TOM WOLF, JOHE E. WETZEL, DANIEL BURNS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv02630
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mediator:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MORALES v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2010cv39010
Plaintiff:
ARISTIDE J. MORALES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST , ACANDS, INC., ACORN IRON & SUPPLY CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
MORALES v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2009cv91133
Plaintiff:
PONIANO J. MORALES and PONIANO J. MORALES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ACORN IRON & SUPPLY CO., ANCHOR PACKING CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
VELEZ et al v. ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv63419
Plaintiff:
GILBERTO GILBERTO VELEZ, GILBERTO GILBERTO VELEZ, IRMA IRMA VELEZ and others
Defendant:
ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY, INC., A.P. Green Refractor, ARMSTRONG WORLD IND., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
