Cases 1 - 10 of 10
NASH v. ALLEN-MCMILLAN et al
as 2:2022cv03447
Plaintiff:
ASKIAA J. NASH
Defendant:
DR. ANGELICA ALLEN-MCMILLAN, ROGER LEON, DR. YOLANDA MENDEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NASH v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2022cv01804
Plaintiff:
ASKIAA J. NASH
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, NEWARK BOARD OF EDUCATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
THOMPSON v. PATTON et al
as 2:2013cv02023
Plaintiff:
JAMES THOMPSON
Defendant:
BRIAN J. PATTON, DAVID ORTIZ, J. NASH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GODFREY v. PATTON et al
as 2:2013cv02024
Plaintiff:
DERRICK GODFREY
Defendant:
BRIAN J. PATTON, DAVID ORTIZ, J. NASH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NASH v. DOW et al
as 2:2011cv03891
Petitioner:
ASKIA J. NASH
Respondent:
PAULA T. DOW and KAREN BALICKI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NASH v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv53143
Plaintiff:
THOMAS J. NASH
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
NASH v. ESSEX COUNTY PROSECUTOR PAULA T. DOW et al
as 2:2007cv05163
Plaintiff:
ASKIA J. NASH
Defendant:
ESSEX COUNTY PROSECUTOR PAULA T. DOW, JOHN LOVE, DAWN SIMONETTI and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
NASH v. BALICKI
as 2:2007cv03074
Petitioner:
ASKIA J. NASH
Respondent:
KAREN BALICKI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NASH v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY (APPELLATE DIVISION) et al
as 3:2007cv00642
Plaintiff:
ASKIA J. NASH
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY (APPELLATE DIVISION), EDWIN STERN, JOHN HOLSTON, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NASH v. DOW et al
as 2:2007cv00370
Plaintiff:
ASKIA J. NASH
Defendant:
PAULA T. DOW, NICOLE AMATO and DEBORAH MENZEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
