Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Than Orn, et al v. City of Tacoma, et al
as 18-35379
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THAN ORN, individually, THALISA ORN, individually and CLARISSE ORN, Guardian on behalf of J. O. on behalf of C. O.
Defendant - Appellant:
CITY OF TACOMA, a municipal corporation and KRISTOPHER CLARK, in his individual capacity
Salma Agha-Khan, MD v. United States of America et al
as 2:2017cv03186
Defendant:
Kirk Edward Sherriff, Debbie Banducci, Barry L Goldner and others
Plaintiff:
Salma Agha-Khan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00924
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
State Bar of Arizona v. Moffatt
as 2:2016cv00376
Respondent:
State Bar of Arizona and William J O'Neil
Petitioner:
Jeffrey D Moffatt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Aguirre v. O'Neil et al
as 2:2015cv01836
Plaintiff:
Antonio M Aguirre
Defendant:
William J O'Neil, Theresa H Ratliff, Karen J Stillwell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv05654
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
O. v. Tacoma School District No. 10
as 3:2015cv05079
Plaintiff:
J. O.
Defendant:
Tacoma School District No. 10
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Paul J. O'Brien v. Ron Carpenter et al
as 8:2014cv01323
Defendant:
Ron Carpenter, Yvonne Carpenter and Does
Plaintiff:
Paul J O'Brien
Thymes v. People of the State of California et al
as 5:2014cv02377
Plaintiff:
John A. Thymes
Defendant:
People of the State of California, Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Kamala Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Margaret Mable v. United States District Court for the Central District California et al
as 2:2014cv00182
Defendant:
Department of Justice, Daniel J O'Brian, Levet O'Brian and others
Plaintiff:
Margaret Mable
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
