Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Carolyn Primm v. TN Dept of Corrections, et al
as 19-6100
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES HAMILTON, DERRICK D. SCHOFIELD, EUGENIE BAIRD WHITESELL, Assistant Attorney and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CAROLYN PRIMM
Long et al v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv07927
Plaintiff:
Jason K. Long , Golden Glow Farms, Inc. , Thoams Oberreuter and others
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Seeds, Inc. , Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Long et al v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as MN/0:15-cv-01969
Plaintiff:
Jason K. Long , Golden Glow Farms, Inc. , Thoams Oberreuter and others
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Seeds, Inc. , Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. and others
Long et al v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 0:2015cv01969
Plaintiff:
Jason K. Long , Golden Glow Farms, Inc. , Thoams Oberreuter and others
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Seeds, Inc. , Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sanford v. Miller
as 1:2014cv01178
Petitioner:
Gerald A. Sanford, Sr.
Respondent:
J. R. Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sanford v. Miller
as 2:2014cv01178
Petitioner:
Gerald A. Sanford, Sr.
Respondent:
J. R. Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brown v. Miller
as 2:2013cv02180
Respondent:
J. R. Miller
Petitioner:
Anthony Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Miller
as 3:2013cv00240
Respondent:
J. R. Miller
Plaintiff:
Anthony Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Joseph Stinnett v. J. Miller
as 13-5202
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSEPH FREDERICK STINNETT
Respondent - Appellee:
J. R. MILLER, Warden
Sanford v. Miller
as 3:2012cv01271
Petitioner:
Gerald Sanford
Respondent:
J. R. Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
