Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Thigpen et al v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv03115
Plaintiff:
Douglas Thigpen and Myron Rockett
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Officer Suzanne L. Niemoth, Star No. 17958, Officer Nicholas K. Dedore, Star No. 6889 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Charlena Michelle Cooks v. City of Barstow et al
as 5:2015cv01153
Defendant:
City of Barstow, R. Colleoc, R. Colleoc and others
Plaintiff:
Charlena Michelle Cooks and A. O.
Charlena Michelle Cooks v. City of Barstow et al
as 2:2015cv04415
Defendant:
City of Barstow, R. Colleoc, R. Colleoc and others
Plaintiff:
Charlena Michelle Cooks and A. O.
Cooks v. Ramirez et al
as 2:2015cv04255
Defendant:
Ronan Colleoc, DOES 1-10, inclusive, Albert Ramirez, Jr and others
Plaintiff:
Charlena Michelle Cooks
Perez v. City of San Antonio, Texas et al
as 5:2015cv00275
Defendant:
City of San Antonio, Texas and J. Silva
Plaintiff:
Arlene Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Caddo et al
as 5:2012cv00188
Plaintiff:
Melody Smith
Defendant:
Parish of Caddo, LA Dept of Public Safety & Corrections, City of Shreveport and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Coney et al
as 5:2010cv00445
Plaintiff:
Alfred Dewayne Lewis
Defendant:
Darryl Coney, J. J. Silva and City of Shreveport
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morrison v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2009cv02880
Plaintiff:
Fenton Morrison
Defendant:
The City of New York, Michael J. Silva and "John Does Nos. 1-2"
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Zeidan et al v. Shreveport et al
as 5:2008cv01347
Defendant:
City of Shreveport, Henry L Whitehorn, E R Howard and others
Plaintiff:
Jamal Silva Zeidan and Azizeh Zeidan
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00249
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
