Cases 21 - 30 of 34
WARREN v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2016cv06766
Plaintiff:
PAUL WARREN
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, JAMES OWENS, J. TAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. CAMDEN CORR FACILITY
as 1:2016cv06352
Plaintiff:
RASHON JOHNSON
Defendant:
CAMDEN CORR FACILITY, JAMES OWENS, J. TAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2016cv06378
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL D. JONES
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, JAMES OWENS, J. TAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLEMAN v. OWENS et al
as 1:2016cv06190
Plaintiff:
VINCENT COLEMAN
Defendant:
JAMES OWENS, J. TAYLOR, CAMDEN COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLEMAN v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2016cv06267
Plaintiff:
BRAHEEM K. COLEMAN
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, JAMES OWENS, J. TAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
George Taylor, III v. Nish, et al
as 13-3883
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE J. TAYLOR, III
Defendant - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and JOSEPH P. NISH, Superintendent
Taylor v. United States et al
as 1:2013cv01356
Plaintiff:
Everette J. Taylor
Defendant:
United States , Ronnie Holt, Angela P. Dunbar and others
Mediator:
Mediator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. TAYLOR
as 2:2012cv02783
Petitioner:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Respondent:
JOSEPH J. TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
George Taylor, III v. Attorney General Pennsylvania, et al
as 12-1660
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE J. TAYLOR, III
Defendant - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and JOSEPH P. NISH
TAYLOR v. VISINSKY et al
as 3:2012cv00046
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH J. TAYLOR
Defendant:
JOSEPH W. VISINSKY, DENISE R. THOMAS, JACK DEPNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
